One year of PaperPict: what we learned about figures
Eleven months, six tools, and a lot of figures. Some of what we learned we expected. Some of it we didn't.
Read article →BLOG
Product announcements, workflow guides, and opinions about the craft of scientific illustration. Published since October 2025.
Eleven months, six tools, and a lot of figures. Some of what we learned we expected. Some of it we didn't.
Read article →Systematic reviewers lose hours to a diagram whose main job is arithmetic. So we did the arithmetic.
Read article →Let's be honest: most posters get made the night before. Here's how to make a good one in the time you actually have.
Read article →Not everyone on the author list owns a vector editor. Everyone has PowerPoint.
Read article →Around 8% of men and 0.5% of women can't rely on red–green contrast. We changed our defaults so figures work for them even when nobody remembers to check.
Read article →We timed ourselves making the same correction on a flat image and on an editable figure. The gap was bigger than we expected, and it changes what people are willing to fix.
Read article →The paper already contains the story. We taught PaperPict to read it.
Read article →Publishers rarely mandate colours, but you can spot a Nature figure from across the room. Matching that look is easier than it sounds.
Read article →A bitmap is a photograph of a drawing. We wanted to hand you the drawing.
Read article →Today we're opening PaperPict to researchers. Here's what it does, what it deliberately doesn't do, and why the thing it gives you is a drawing rather than a picture.
Read article →Free to start. No credit card. Every element stays editable.